Is there no end to the crimes committed by the Church and State? The horror of the institutionalised rape, slavery and crimes against children carried out in Ireland is almost too much. Few read the reports of the investigations finally carried out on what actually happened to survivors of child abuse and the children interned in industrial schools. Since the foundation of the Republic of Ireland in 1921, Church and State have treated certain children as disposable, as less than human.
Since the publication of the Ryan report on industrial schools and the Murphy report on child sexual abuse within the diocese of Dublin, revelations on the treatment of Irish citizens in the twentieth century by the Church and State have undermined everything we believed about ourselves. And the revelations keep coming.
The Primate of All Ireland Sean Brady covered up the rape of children by paedophile Brendan Smyth allowing him to continue raping children for a further nineteen years. The publication of this information has not led to his resignation but rather to his adopting the persona of a “wounded healer”. This persona allows him to continue in his position and treat survivors of the Catholic Church’s brutality with utter contempt. His "wounding" is the discovery of his coverup.
Then there is the systematic mutilation of women by doctors both through symphysiotomy and corrupt individuals wielding a scalpel. There was no oversight because doctors were “self-regulating”. And the medical scandals have not ceased - unread x rays, trolleys, cancer misdiagnosis, surgeons removing the wrong kidney.
Now, we find out that children were used in medical experiments. These children were not those living at home with parents. These were children in mother and baby homes and industrial schools. Members of religious orders gave "consent", violating numerous ethical codes including that of Nuremberg, which was drawn up in the aftermath of the Nazi behaviour in concentration camps.
All of this was done by Irish people, ordinary Joe and Jane Soap. Our uncles, aunts, friends, parents participated or knew what was going on. We are all complicit. What sort of a fucked up country is this? The human rights violations continue on - children in care left on the street, rat infested schools, children in adult psychiatric wards and the children in care disappearing by the hundreds.
Something has to be done. The Murphy inquiry needs to be expanded to cover all dioeses. Victims who did not survive the industrial schools need to be identified and cause of death established. Serious reform or possible abolition of the HSE. The state needs to acknowledge ALL the human rights violations. Offering resignations is not enough. Firing, followed by criminal charges is a beginning.
Ireland has been a republic for less than 100 years and already we have violated human rights on an unprecedented scale. What sort of people are we?
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Aug 25, 2010
Apr 7, 2010
Brady’s real role in the sex abuse cover up
I have a new post on GlobalComment:
Cardinal Seán Brady celebrated mass on Easter Sunday with some pretty words about rebirth, apologies and child sexual abuse. He did not mention that in the previous week he was asked by survivors of clerical sex abuse to resign. He did not announce his resignation. Instead, during his Easter Sunday sermon, he pledged to remain in his position:
Implicitly, Brady refuses to resign. He will not carry out the request of the survivors of clerical sex abuse. Yet he sees no difficulty including in preaching about the seriousness of the wounds inflicted by the church:
While it is not quite a non-apology apology, it comes close. As the primate of all Ireland, Brady speaks in generalities. He does not apologise for his personal sins of omission and commission.
Indeed, the portrayal of Brady as a youthful, ignorant school master is a public relations exercise. He received his advanced degree in canon law at the elite Pontifical Lateran University in Rome. There is no Catholic education institution more highly regarded than that he attended. The man is an expert on canon law and has been since 1957.
At the young age of thirty nine, Brady was asked by his bishop, Francis McKiernan, to conduct a canonical inquiry into an allegation of child sexual abuse by Norbertine priest Brendan Smyth. The upshot of the inquiry led to the suspension of Smyth’s confessional privileges. Brady reported to McKiernan who, in turn, passed the information to Norbertine Abbot Kevin Smith, Smyth’s superior.
The question is why was the information never passed on to the police. To answer that, I delved into the history of the monastery. I spoke extensively to people from the diocese of Kilmore, many of whom knew the protagonists well.
I was told that Felim Colwell, Abbot at Kilnacrott until 1968, was a strange man. He had grandiose ideas and an inflated view of his own self importance. At public ceremonies in Saint Patrick and Saint Feidlim’s Cathedral in Cavan, Colwell would dress entirely in white, mimicking the Pope, and proffer his ring to be kissed. This was unusual and made quite an impression on those who attended such functions.
Continue reading here
Cardinal Seán Brady celebrated mass on Easter Sunday with some pretty words about rebirth, apologies and child sexual abuse. He did not mention that in the previous week he was asked by survivors of clerical sex abuse to resign. He did not announce his resignation. Instead, during his Easter Sunday sermon, he pledged to remain in his position:
I am resolved to continue to keep the safeguarding of children central to the Mission of the Catholic Church in Ireland. We all have a critical part to play in safeguarding children.
Implicitly, Brady refuses to resign. He will not carry out the request of the survivors of clerical sex abuse. Yet he sees no difficulty including in preaching about the seriousness of the wounds inflicted by the church:
We must take them seriously. We can only move on into the future if we first own our own personal misdeeds. We have to recognise the harm they have done and be resolved to do whatever is necessary to atone for the crimes that have happened and prevent their reoccurrence. Once again, I apologise with all my heart to all survivors of clerical child sexual abuse. At the Good Friday ceremonies in Dundalk I pledged that proper reparation would be made for the harm that has been caused and I renew that pledge this morning.
While it is not quite a non-apology apology, it comes close. As the primate of all Ireland, Brady speaks in generalities. He does not apologise for his personal sins of omission and commission.
Indeed, the portrayal of Brady as a youthful, ignorant school master is a public relations exercise. He received his advanced degree in canon law at the elite Pontifical Lateran University in Rome. There is no Catholic education institution more highly regarded than that he attended. The man is an expert on canon law and has been since 1957.
At the young age of thirty nine, Brady was asked by his bishop, Francis McKiernan, to conduct a canonical inquiry into an allegation of child sexual abuse by Norbertine priest Brendan Smyth. The upshot of the inquiry led to the suspension of Smyth’s confessional privileges. Brady reported to McKiernan who, in turn, passed the information to Norbertine Abbot Kevin Smith, Smyth’s superior.
The question is why was the information never passed on to the police. To answer that, I delved into the history of the monastery. I spoke extensively to people from the diocese of Kilmore, many of whom knew the protagonists well.
I was told that Felim Colwell, Abbot at Kilnacrott until 1968, was a strange man. He had grandiose ideas and an inflated view of his own self importance. At public ceremonies in Saint Patrick and Saint Feidlim’s Cathedral in Cavan, Colwell would dress entirely in white, mimicking the Pope, and proffer his ring to be kissed. This was unusual and made quite an impression on those who attended such functions.
Continue reading here
Dec 3, 2009
I write letters
Dear Taoiseach,
That you are a coward and a liar does not surprise me. That you are unable to do what is necessary to fix the economy does not surprise me. That you were too drunk on your latest visit to China to attend two press conferences does not surprise me.
On the other hand, that you kowtow to pedophiles, rapists, criminal facilitators and accessories after the fact does surprise me. You say it is not a state issue. You are wrong. If you cannot conceive that the state is supposed to protect children from a rapacious and foul pedophiliac organisation, you are not fit to lead this country or a political party. That you do not immediately expel the papal nuncio is disgusting. That you have no respect for the citizens of your country is revolting. That you do less than the bare minimum is abhorrent.
I met you in the UN in September 2003. You were there with Bertie to give one of the worst speeches at the GA that year. Not for a second did I believe Bertie's greasy faux sincerity but you impressed me. You seemed sincere. How wrong was I.
You messed up the economy, stood by while the country drowned, appointed incompetent ministers and have generally been one of the worst leaders to date but this is the final death knell for any human kindness or respect you ever had. The Ryan report. The Murphy report. Just how many details of atrocities do you need to read before you act (assuming you have read the reports. I'm sure a civil servant condensed them for you)? How many children must die or suffer horrific sexual abuse before you take action?
Here are some actions to take just in case you do not know what to do:
- expel the Nuncio (yes you have that power and yes you should be using it)
- expel all religious orders named in the Ryan report (that you have not done this already is frankly baffling)
- have the DPP charge the bishops with being accessories after the fact, criminal negligence and co conspirators.
- If the Vatican is considered a state, insist that the ICJ investigates charges of crimes against humanity and crimes against children. If it is not considered a state then initiate criminal proceedings against it for criminal conspiracy and cover up
- apologise
- formally declare which members of the government are involved in secret societies. It is not credible that they are that incompetent. You might remind them of Matthew 25:40 "whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me."
Regards,
Mór Rígan
Voter and citizen
That you are a coward and a liar does not surprise me. That you are unable to do what is necessary to fix the economy does not surprise me. That you were too drunk on your latest visit to China to attend two press conferences does not surprise me.
On the other hand, that you kowtow to pedophiles, rapists, criminal facilitators and accessories after the fact does surprise me. You say it is not a state issue. You are wrong. If you cannot conceive that the state is supposed to protect children from a rapacious and foul pedophiliac organisation, you are not fit to lead this country or a political party. That you do not immediately expel the papal nuncio is disgusting. That you have no respect for the citizens of your country is revolting. That you do less than the bare minimum is abhorrent.
I met you in the UN in September 2003. You were there with Bertie to give one of the worst speeches at the GA that year. Not for a second did I believe Bertie's greasy faux sincerity but you impressed me. You seemed sincere. How wrong was I.
You messed up the economy, stood by while the country drowned, appointed incompetent ministers and have generally been one of the worst leaders to date but this is the final death knell for any human kindness or respect you ever had. The Ryan report. The Murphy report. Just how many details of atrocities do you need to read before you act (assuming you have read the reports. I'm sure a civil servant condensed them for you)? How many children must die or suffer horrific sexual abuse before you take action?
Here are some actions to take just in case you do not know what to do:
- expel the Nuncio (yes you have that power and yes you should be using it)
- expel all religious orders named in the Ryan report (that you have not done this already is frankly baffling)
- have the DPP charge the bishops with being accessories after the fact, criminal negligence and co conspirators.
- If the Vatican is considered a state, insist that the ICJ investigates charges of crimes against humanity and crimes against children. If it is not considered a state then initiate criminal proceedings against it for criminal conspiracy and cover up
- apologise
- formally declare which members of the government are involved in secret societies. It is not credible that they are that incompetent. You might remind them of Matthew 25:40 "whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me."
Regards,
Mór Rígan
Voter and citizen
Sep 1, 2009
This word does not mean what you think it means
Today's Irish Times has a piece of the increase of Irish women turning to and returning to sex work in part because of poverty caused by the crash and subsequent mismanagement of the economy.
In the same article Gerardine Rowley, spokeswoman for Ruhama, talks about the increasing number of underage girls and young women that are being trafficked from the developing world into Ireland for the purpose of sexual exploitation.
It is great that this issue is getting some coverage in the press but I have very unimpressed with the title of the article.
"Increase in Irishwomen engaged in street vice"
It is classic victim-blaming in our little Irish morality play. "Vice"? Really? That's the best the Irish Times can come up with. I think the IT needs to consult a bloody dictionary.
So either the editor who inserted the headline needs a dictionary instead of a payrise or the IT is attempting to shame women who engage in sex work both voluntarily or not or someone on the IT staff is an old fashioned misogynist who is trying to enact a morality play.
The headline could have read something like this
"Increased demand for paid sex from Irishmen leads to sexual exploitation and trafficking in underage girls"
But we can't have a headline like that, can we. In the same way that women "get raped", sex workers "engage in sex work". The role of men is obscured.
Twas ever so in green old Erin's Isle. Blame the women and girls. Lock them up in the Magdalene Laundries, to labour without pay for the rest of their lives, while the men and boys went free.
I know the editors write the titles so I'm not slamming the journalist but I think that the paper of record needs to understand that disappearing men from an article on sex work is not acceptable. Nor is it acceptable to moralise about how some people make ends meet.
In the same article Gerardine Rowley, spokeswoman for Ruhama, talks about the increasing number of underage girls and young women that are being trafficked from the developing world into Ireland for the purpose of sexual exploitation.
It is great that this issue is getting some coverage in the press but I have very unimpressed with the title of the article.
"Increase in Irishwomen engaged in street vice"
It is classic victim-blaming in our little Irish morality play. "Vice"? Really? That's the best the Irish Times can come up with. I think the IT needs to consult a bloody dictionary.
Vice
Etymology: Middle English 14th century, from Anglo-French, from Latin vitium fault, vice
1. moral depravity or corruption, wickedness, a moral fault or failing, a habitual and usually trivial defect or shortcoming
2. blemish, defect
3. a physical imperfection, deformity, or taint
4. a character representing one of the vices in an English morality play
5. buffoon, jester
6. an abnormal behavior pattern in a domestic animal detrimental to its health or usefulness
7. sexual immorality
So either the editor who inserted the headline needs a dictionary instead of a payrise or the IT is attempting to shame women who engage in sex work both voluntarily or not or someone on the IT staff is an old fashioned misogynist who is trying to enact a morality play.
The headline could have read something like this
"Increased demand for paid sex from Irishmen leads to sexual exploitation and trafficking in underage girls"
But we can't have a headline like that, can we. In the same way that women "get raped", sex workers "engage in sex work". The role of men is obscured.
Twas ever so in green old Erin's Isle. Blame the women and girls. Lock them up in the Magdalene Laundries, to labour without pay for the rest of their lives, while the men and boys went free.
I know the editors write the titles so I'm not slamming the journalist but I think that the paper of record needs to understand that disappearing men from an article on sex work is not acceptable. Nor is it acceptable to moralise about how some people make ends meet.
Jul 30, 2009
Latest blow to civil liberties coming soon to Ireland
Random drug testing on motorists. Nah it's an April July fools joke. That would be in violation of our human rights surely? From the IT
Right so because of the actions of 7.2% of the population, 100% of the drivers of Ireland have to deal with invasive tests. I don't think there's any breathalyzer for cocaine, hash or heroin. What is proposed? Blood, urine or a hair sample. I, for example, will only give blood if it's taken by a medical professional with my full informed consent. And I don't take illicit drugs!
John Curran, who I presume is responsible for this monumental fuck up, is confused. Mixing legal and illegal drugs in the same legislation is a stupid move because of the status of the outcome. What if a person has smoked a joint with the same intoxication as a glass of wine? Joints are illegal but the test is for intoxication. If the person is not intoxicated do the police just let them go or do they arrest for illicit substances. And that's just one of the problems.
Maybe Curran is just trying to entrap one of his FF colleagues that is a well known coke-head. Maybe this is what the government think is a tough stance on drugs? And maybe they are just wondering how many civil liberties they can take away before the people rise up and say "NO MORE".
Ireland is on a right-wing track and is legislating itself into a police state. Dev would be so proud. It's disgusting.
RANDOM DRUG testing of motorists will be a key part of the new anti-drugs strategy to be published in September, said Minister of State John Curran.
Alcohol will also be included in the drugs strategy for the first time, and there will be a designated minister dealing with drugs.
Mr Curran told the Oireachtas committee dealing with community affairs that illegal drug use increased from 5.6 per cent of the population in 2003 to 7.2 per cent in 2007 among the 15-64 age group, although greatest usage was among those under 35.
Right so because of the actions of 7.2% of the population, 100% of the drivers of Ireland have to deal with invasive tests. I don't think there's any breathalyzer for cocaine, hash or heroin. What is proposed? Blood, urine or a hair sample. I, for example, will only give blood if it's taken by a medical professional with my full informed consent. And I don't take illicit drugs!
John Curran, who I presume is responsible for this monumental fuck up, is confused. Mixing legal and illegal drugs in the same legislation is a stupid move because of the status of the outcome. What if a person has smoked a joint with the same intoxication as a glass of wine? Joints are illegal but the test is for intoxication. If the person is not intoxicated do the police just let them go or do they arrest for illicit substances. And that's just one of the problems.
Maybe Curran is just trying to entrap one of his FF colleagues that is a well known coke-head. Maybe this is what the government think is a tough stance on drugs? And maybe they are just wondering how many civil liberties they can take away before the people rise up and say "NO MORE".
Ireland is on a right-wing track and is legislating itself into a police state. Dev would be so proud. It's disgusting.
Jul 2, 2009
Silence is the enemy
To speak is to reveal. It is scary and almost overwhelming but silence is the enemy.
Silence allows people to pontificate on the rarity of rape.
Silence says that one in three is a lie.
Silence allows rapists to get away with it.
Silence permits the proliferation of rape jokes and triggering language.
No more. No more shame. No more self-blame. No more being regarded as a victim with no agency.
My first experience with rape was when I pulled a boy off my friend. We were 14. She was screaming no, and he was ignoring her.
My first rape was in 2000 when a man named Mohamed from Syria raped me in his apartment in Lavitt's Quay in Cork City. A friend, Carla, had introduced us. Carla subsequently doubted my story. I told him to stop, he didn't. I told him he was hurting me and he just kept on going. I tried to struggle but I was pinned down. Afterward he told me he was HIV+.
My second rape was in a back alley in Florence. My drink was spiked and I was unconscious. When I came to, in pain, a stranger's penis was in my anus. When he had finished, he left me bleeding on the ground behind a dumpster.
I've been raped by two men but I will no longer be silent. I will talk, accuse and shout.
I have written more on rape and sexual exploitation on my Cambodia blog.
Child sex abuser gets reduced prison sentence
Gender crimes at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal
The virginity trade in Cambodia
Assault is not a compliment
V Day
Silence allows people to pontificate on the rarity of rape.
Silence says that one in three is a lie.
Silence allows rapists to get away with it.
Silence permits the proliferation of rape jokes and triggering language.
No more. No more shame. No more self-blame. No more being regarded as a victim with no agency.
My first experience with rape was when I pulled a boy off my friend. We were 14. She was screaming no, and he was ignoring her.
My first rape was in 2000 when a man named Mohamed from Syria raped me in his apartment in Lavitt's Quay in Cork City. A friend, Carla, had introduced us. Carla subsequently doubted my story. I told him to stop, he didn't. I told him he was hurting me and he just kept on going. I tried to struggle but I was pinned down. Afterward he told me he was HIV+.
My second rape was in a back alley in Florence. My drink was spiked and I was unconscious. When I came to, in pain, a stranger's penis was in my anus. When he had finished, he left me bleeding on the ground behind a dumpster.
Silence Is The Enemy was started in June 2009 to draw more attention to the sexually abused around the globe and to encourage everyone to talk about it and act.
We have power and influence in our words, and we're able to speak for those who can not. We’re asking all of you—bloggers, writers, teachers and concerned citizens—to use whatever platform you have to call for an end to the rape and abuse of women and girls in Liberia and around the world. [source]
I've been raped by two men but I will no longer be silent. I will talk, accuse and shout.
I have written more on rape and sexual exploitation on my Cambodia blog.
Child sex abuser gets reduced prison sentence
Gender crimes at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal
The virginity trade in Cambodia
Assault is not a compliment
V Day
May 26, 2009
In his own words
Watch this. It's Michael O'Brien on "Questions and Answers". He's a survivor of the Catholic church's child abuse.
Other posts to read:
Church of evil
I write letters
The savage reality of our darkest days
Indemnity and the Catholic Church
The Irish Catholic church and child abuse: it's not about bad apples
Pride - the Catholic church's deadly sin
Other posts to read:
Church of evil
I write letters
The savage reality of our darkest days
Indemnity and the Catholic Church
The Irish Catholic church and child abuse: it's not about bad apples
Pride - the Catholic church's deadly sin
The Catholic Church and child abuse: it's not about bad apples
I have a new piece on GlobalComment. Go check it out.
Other posts to read:
Church of evil
I write letters
The savage reality of our darkest days
Indemnity and the Catholic Church
Other posts to read:
Church of evil
I write letters
The savage reality of our darkest days
Indemnity and the Catholic Church
May 24, 2009
Indemnity and the Catholic Church
I've been searching through The Oireachtas website and have found the compensation act. What I have no found is the deal with CORI, granting limited liability to the catholic church. The only reference is to confidentially of perpetrators as well as survivors.
In art. 28 of the 2002 Residential Institutions Redress Arts section 6 states
and to be extra clear section 9 states
So were are left with "name a criminal and you become a criminal".
Now I'm sure the agreement with CORI and the gov has to be somewhere on the site but before I find it, I have some comments to make with regard to this indemnity.
Under the laws of the land, it is illegal to rape, torture, imprison without trial, make someone a slave and many other deeds by the Church of Evil. Now as more as I might deplore it the government indemnified the church against civil suits, but as far as I know, no government can indemnify a group of accused from criminal prosecution. I propose that people write to the DPP to demand indictments. Here are the contact details
Director of Public Prosecutions,
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions,
14 - 16 Merrion Street,
Dublin 2,
Ireland.
Tel: + 353 1 678 9222
Fax: + 353 1 661 0915
dpp@dppireland.ie
Put the pedophiles, torturers, human rights violators and abuser in prison.
__
Other posts to read:
Church of evil
I write letters
The savage reality of our darkest days
In art. 28 of the 2002 Residential Institutions Redress Arts section 6 states
A person shall not publish any information concerning an application or an award made under this Act that refers to any other person (including an applicant), relevant person or institution by name or which could reasonably lead to the identification of any other person (including an applicant), a relevant person or an institution referred to in an application made under this Act.
and to be extra clear section 9 states
A person who contravenes subsection (1) or subsection (6) shall be guilty of an offence.
So were are left with "name a criminal and you become a criminal".
Now I'm sure the agreement with CORI and the gov has to be somewhere on the site but before I find it, I have some comments to make with regard to this indemnity.
Under the laws of the land, it is illegal to rape, torture, imprison without trial, make someone a slave and many other deeds by the Church of Evil. Now as more as I might deplore it the government indemnified the church against civil suits, but as far as I know, no government can indemnify a group of accused from criminal prosecution. I propose that people write to the DPP to demand indictments. Here are the contact details
Director of Public Prosecutions,
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions,
14 - 16 Merrion Street,
Dublin 2,
Ireland.
Tel: + 353 1 678 9222
Fax: + 353 1 661 0915
dpp@dppireland.ie
Put the pedophiles, torturers, human rights violators and abuser in prison.
__
Other posts to read:
Church of evil
I write letters
The savage reality of our darkest days
May 23, 2009
I write letters
Dear Taoiseach,
The only reasonable response to the Commission's Report is to
The catholic church should have no special place in this state.
Regards,
Mór Rígan
Citizen and voter
The only reasonable response to the Commission's Report is to
- Name and prosecute the individuals for crimes against humanity and crimes against children
- Confiscate the land and holdings of all the congregations named in the report
- Advocate an immediate referendum to remove all references to the Catholic Church from our Constitution and public life
- Sell the assets of the Church and pay compensation to the survivors
- Refurbish Artane or Letterfrack to was it was in 1950 and have it as a permanent reminder of what was done by the Church and what was ignored by the State.
The catholic church should have no special place in this state.
Regards,
Mór Rígan
Citizen and voter
Church of evil
Everybody knows that the Catholic Church ruled the roost in Ireland. Everybody knows that children in school were beaten. Everybody knows that there was child sexual abuse. But until a few days ago the vast majority of the people of Ireland did not know how widespread the sexual abuse and violence were and that children were enslaved, raped, tortured and abused systematically in both residential and day schools and institutions.
Witness reports (trigger-warning)
Female
Male
These accounts cover just one of the four aspects of abuse. See the reports for more detail.
The Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse has published its five volume report on 20 May and this report has examined in detail the accusations and evidence presented to it.
The Commission was established on 23 May, 2000, pursuant to the “Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse Act 2000” and given three primary functions:
The reports are damning, and the acts uncovered are criminal.
The reports make for horrific reading. The vast majority of children were committed to industrial or reformatory schools from 1936 to 1970 because they were ‘needy’. Other reasons of commitment were involvement in a criminal offense or school nonattendance. Involvement in a criminal offense included girls who had been ‘morally corrupted’. In fact, girls as young as eight who had been raped or abused, or even those children in contact with such girls, were considered unsuitable for an ordinary industrial school and were sent to reformatories instead.
It took little to be committed. Orphans, poor children, abused children and children who skipped school were committed.
Once the child's time was served, their parents could get them out but parents' weren't informed nor educted and the procedure was complicated.
The children were tortured and enslaved by the Catholic Church in Ireland.
The state failed to supervise.
The state indemnified the Church.
The state is still fighting survivors in the courts.
The violence, torture, rape, abuse and slavery that happened is obscene. Those who directly enslaved, raped, tortured, abused and violated children have been indemnified against civil prosecution. Those who stood by and let it happen are just as guilty.
The words of President McAleese "it was an atrocious betrayal of love" are mealy-mouthed and underplay the obscene treatment of children.
The state and the various congregations have gone along with the "few bad apples" argument which as been disproved time after time. (Philip Zimbardo The Lucifer Effect: understanding how good people turn evil)
The Irish Times reported on 22 May
It makes me sick to my stomach to know that such crimes were widespread. The mealy-mouthed "apologies" and shocked expressions is not enough. Firstly we have to name what happened. These acts by religious congregations were crimes against children and crimes against humanity.
The Catholic church has to own up to its criminal responsibilities and convictions must be sought. Then all assets should be frozen and confiscated. Then we remove any mention of the church from our constitution and public life. Once they have repaid financially and served time for their crimes, the named congregations forced to leave the country.
Witness reports (trigger-warning)
Female
The forms of physical abuse reported by witnesses ranged from being smacked on the hand to being beaten naked in front of others. They described being hit, slapped, beaten, kicked, pushed, pinched, burned, bitten, shaken violently, physically restrained, and force fed. The Committee also heard reports of witnesses having their heads knocked against walls, desks and window ledges, being beaten on the soles of their feet, the backs of their hands, around their heads and ears, having their hair pulled, being swung off the ground by their hair, and made to perform tasks that they stated put them at risk of harm and danger. The locations where physical abuse was most frequently reported to have occurred included dormitories, refectories, landings, corridors, classrooms, churches, offices, kitchens, work areas and recreation halls.
(We were)... beaten everywhere, bang your head off the wall, pinch your cheeks, beat you with a cane.... She ...(Sr X)... would grab you and hit you.
I remember once I got a big yellow blister on my hand, it was really painful.... Normally when you got a beating from someone you had to hold your hand out for a slap like that ... (demonstrated outstretched palm)... not always of course, some of them would hit you anywhere on the legs or anywhere. ... She ... (Sr X)... said “Why are you holding your hand out like that? Give me the other hand”....You have to have 10 on that hand and 10 on the other. I couldn’t part with this hand, it was yellow and throbbing it was, and she forced it open and slapped it. The blister burst, I’ll never forget the pain.
Further forms of physical abuse described by witnesses involved being made to kneel for hours on hard surfaces, both indoors and in outside yards, being locked in confined and dark areas such as coal houses, furnace rooms, animal sheds, broom cupboards and fridges, made to stand for lengthy periods and being doused and immersed in cold water.
Having objects such as a wooden statue, metal tray and knives thrown at them was reported as a physical abuse by a small number of witnesses.
In addition to being hit, witnesses reported that, at times they were burned, had water thrown over them or were held under water, as described:
- Nineteen (19) witnesses reported being put into cold or scalding baths or showers.
- Twelve (12) witnesses reported having water thrown over them, five of whom were scalded with hot tea or water.
- Eight (8) witnesses reported having their heads held under water, including two whose heads were held under a cold running tap.
- Five (5) witnesses reported being burned with hot pokers or by having their hands held to a fire or on a hot stove.
- Two (2) witnesses reported having their fingers held to electric sockets.
One of the girls she was very sick. I let her come into my bed one morning, she was very, very ill. They brought me down to the shoe room, they stripped me off, they threw cold water over me ... (prior to severe beating).... It was the shoe room you know where all the shoes were, even now if I get the smell of shoe polish, the feeling of enclosement, it was awful.
Six (6) witnesses gave accounts of nettles being used by nuns when punishing residents. They described being pushed into patches of nettles, hit on the legs with them, and, in one instance, their bed being full of nettles. ‘Sr ...X... put nettles in the bed of the girls who wet the bed.’ Other witnesses described being pinched with pliers, jabbed with a knitting needle, hit with shoes, a shovel, wet dishcloths, bunches of keys, serving spoons, scissors, electric cord and the treadle belt from a sewing machine.
Male
Witnesses described a daily existence that involved the possibility of being hit by a staff member at any time, for any reason or for no reason. Witnesses also reported being physically abused by co-residents. It is notable that witnesses at times described daily, casual and random physical abuse as normal and wished to report only the times when the frequency and severity of the abuse was such that they were injured or in fear for their lives. Three hundred and forty six (346) of the 403 witnesses reported that they were subjected to frequent physical violence; they described a climate of pervasive fear in the Schools and provided consistent reports of generally not knowing why they were being beaten.
The forms of physical abuse reported by witnesses to the Committee included punching, flogging, assault and bodily attacks, hitting with the hand, kicking, ear pulling, hair pulling, head shaving, beating on the soles of the feet, burning, scalding, stabbing, severe beatings with or without clothes, being made to kneel and stand in fixed positions for lengthy periods, made to sleep outside overnight, being forced into cold or excessively hot baths and showers, hosed down with cold water before being beaten, beaten while hanging from hooks on the wall, being set upon by dogs, being restrained in order to be beaten, physical assaults by more than one person, and having objects thrown at them.
The locations where physical abuse was reported to have taken place included: classrooms, offices, cloakrooms, dormitories, showers, infirmaries, refectories, the bedrooms of staff members, churches, work areas and trade shops, fields, farmyards, play/sports areas and outdoor sheds.
I had a hiding in the boot room, you had to take your shirt off, you were completely naked and he ...(Br X)... beat me with a strap and a hurley stick on the behind and the legs and that.
I was beaten up quite a few times for not making the bed right, I had to go to the boot room. We used have long night shirts then you know, he ...(Br X)... dragged it off me, naked and whop, he knocked hell out of me, he knocked the shit out of me ... he hit with a leather strap with coins in it. One Brother ... he used a tyre he did, a bicycle tyre, it used to wrap around your arm. That was for wiping my nose in my sleeve, he didn’t like that, it “wasn’t a nice thing” he said.
A small number of witnesses stated that Brothers were trained to beat residents and reports were heard of religious Brothers demonstrating the exercise of discipline to trainee Brothers.
One day it was ...visitor’s day... they used to pick about half a dozen lads. You would be called to the hall. I was picked once and they would actually show the ...visiting student Brothers... how to do the hiding. The Brother who was in charge of the playground, mostly Br ...X... or Br ...Y... would show them how it’s done, they would give you a hiding to show them and then they would have a go, with the black jack ...(leather)... with loops of lead in it or steel.
Witnesses reported being introduced to a strict regime from the moment of their arrival in the School.
We were met by Br ...X... he ruled the roost, he told us about the rules, said if we ran away there was severe punishment, the second time our head would be shaved and the third time we would be sent to ...named School.... He then stripped us off, told us to bend over the desk; he hit the desk with a leather strap and said, “Say the Our Father”. I could not say it. He hit me across the legs and warned me not to step out of line. He told us to get in the shower, cold water, “to scrub away your sins”, with carbolic soap. He then left and came back with clothes, comb ... he hit me with the strap when I had the clothes on because I should be in pyjamas. We went to the dormitory, the boys were asleep, he said, “This will always be your bed unless you wet the bed, then you will end up with the smellies with Mr ...Y...”. It was dark, there was no food. I was very upset and frightened. Then that night Mr ...Y... came walking down with his walking stick, he touched my penis with the stick and said, “Don’t ever let me catch you”. Later I could hear kids crying as he lashed kids with a stick, getting them up for the toilet. That was my first night in ...named School....
The day I arrived there, I was in the yard and there was all these boys, they all seemed like giants. I remember running up to this man and saying “hello Father” he laid into me, he was a very cruel man, I thought he was a priest, he said “don’t call me Father”. He laid me on the ground, he gave me a few terrible clatters and I was terrified from that moment. He was Br ...X... I was terrified of him, oh Lord! ...distressed... he was just cruel.
These accounts cover just one of the four aspects of abuse. See the reports for more detail.
The Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse has published its five volume report on 20 May and this report has examined in detail the accusations and evidence presented to it.
The Commission was established on 23 May, 2000, pursuant to the “Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse Act 2000” and given three primary functions:
- to hear evidence of abuse from persons who allege they suffered abuse in childhood, in institutions, during the period from 1940 or earlier, to the present day;
- to conduct an inquiry into abuse of children in institutions during that period and, where satisfied that abuse occurred, to determine the causes, nature, circumstances and extent of such abuse; and
- to prepare and publish reports on the results of the inquiry and on its recommendations in relation to dealing with the effects of such abuse.
The reports are damning, and the acts uncovered are criminal.
The reports make for horrific reading. The vast majority of children were committed to industrial or reformatory schools from 1936 to 1970 because they were ‘needy’. Other reasons of commitment were involvement in a criminal offense or school nonattendance. Involvement in a criminal offense included girls who had been ‘morally corrupted’. In fact, girls as young as eight who had been raped or abused, or even those children in contact with such girls, were considered unsuitable for an ordinary industrial school and were sent to reformatories instead.
It took little to be committed. Orphans, poor children, abused children and children who skipped school were committed.
Once the child's time was served, their parents could get them out but parents' weren't informed nor educted and the procedure was complicated.
The children were tortured and enslaved by the Catholic Church in Ireland.
The state failed to supervise.
The state indemnified the Church.
The state is still fighting survivors in the courts.
The violence, torture, rape, abuse and slavery that happened is obscene. Those who directly enslaved, raped, tortured, abused and violated children have been indemnified against civil prosecution. Those who stood by and let it happen are just as guilty.
The words of President McAleese "it was an atrocious betrayal of love" are mealy-mouthed and underplay the obscene treatment of children.
The state and the various congregations have gone along with the "few bad apples" argument which as been disproved time after time. (Philip Zimbardo The Lucifer Effect: understanding how good people turn evil)
The Irish Times reported on 22 May
None of the 18 religious congregations that were party to the redress agreement with the Government seven years ago has any plans to look again at its terms, the Conference of Religious in Ireland (Cori) said last night.
The 18 congregations involved were those which managed residential institutions where children were physically, emotionally and sexually abused, as well as neglected, according to the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse report, published on Wednesday.
In a statement to The Irish Times , following a query on the matter, Cori said: “In 2002 the Conference of Religious in Ireland facilitated 18 of its members in entering into an agreement with the Government on a Redress Scheme for victims of institutional abuse. This agreement included an indemnity clause that lapsed after three years.
“An agreement was made between the congregations concerned and the Government that a contribution of € 128 million (cash and property) be made to the Redress Scheme, which was established by Government. As far as we are aware none of the congregations concerned plan to revisit the terms of the agreement made in good faith.”
It makes me sick to my stomach to know that such crimes were widespread. The mealy-mouthed "apologies" and shocked expressions is not enough. Firstly we have to name what happened. These acts by religious congregations were crimes against children and crimes against humanity.
The Catholic church has to own up to its criminal responsibilities and convictions must be sought. Then all assets should be frozen and confiscated. Then we remove any mention of the church from our constitution and public life. Once they have repaid financially and served time for their crimes, the named congregations forced to leave the country.
Labels:
catholic church,
child abuse,
children,
double standards,
ethics,
fucked up,
gender based violence,
human rights,
ireland,
mental health,
religion,
ryan report,
scumbags,
violence
Apr 29, 2009
People are assholes
That is all...
until I come up to a polite way to say "fuck you Ryanair". It's their responsibility to provide seats that fit people rather than discriminating against people because of a physical characteristic.
until I come up to a polite way to say "fuck you Ryanair". It's their responsibility to provide seats that fit people rather than discriminating against people because of a physical characteristic.
Apr 2, 2009
"Provoked beyond reason"
David Bourke stabbed his wife to death in front of their children. The Irish Times covers it here.
"Provoked beyond reason"? There is nothing provocative about a marriage ending. In Europe, one in every two couples divorces on average. Leaving a partner is a mundane and common, if sad, occurrence. He was not "provoked beyond reason". He chose to murder her. He chose to stab her in front of their children. This is gender based violence. Bourke stabbed his wife because he was angry. He murdered her for leaving him. He murdered her because he could.
Being born a woman is the single biggest risk of violence. Trigger warning on vids.
And for all those who would deny it, yes it happens in Ireland too.
I'm not denying the existence of violence against men by women but studies have shown that women are seven times more likely to need medical care afterward. Gilbert did not survive the domestic violence Bourke subjected her to.
Bourke was found guilty of murder. It was not a crime of passion. There was no provocation. It was premeditated.
It is disgusting that this defense was even considered. It's classic blame-the-victim. Bourke's defense boils down to "she made me do it" and "she was asking for it". Gilbert did not make Bourke stab her four times in front of their children. Gilbert did not ask to be murdered. Gilbert did not ask for her children to be traumatised.
Bourke tried to cowardly free himself from the responsibility of his actions. But the jury has spoken. I'm sure Gilbert didn't ask for Bourke to spend his life in prison either. He has committed murder. It's his responsibility. Gilbert is the victim. Bourke was not "provoked beyond reason".
A MAN who stabbed his wife to death in front of their three children has been given a life sentence for murder.
David Bourke (49) admitted stabbing Jean Gilbert (45) to death in front of their three children at the family home in Laverna Dale, Castleknock, Co Dublin, on August 28th, 2007, but denied murdering her.
He claimed to have been provoked beyond reason by his wife’s affair with English-born musician Robert Campion who had re-entered his wife’s life four months previously.
She had told Bourke that she was going to leave him.
The “last straw” had been the meal that Ms Gilbert had with Mr Campion at the family home two days before she died.
"Provoked beyond reason"? There is nothing provocative about a marriage ending. In Europe, one in every two couples divorces on average. Leaving a partner is a mundane and common, if sad, occurrence. He was not "provoked beyond reason". He chose to murder her. He chose to stab her in front of their children. This is gender based violence. Bourke stabbed his wife because he was angry. He murdered her for leaving him. He murdered her because he could.
Being born a woman is the single biggest risk of violence. Trigger warning on vids.
And for all those who would deny it, yes it happens in Ireland too.
Ireland - In Making the Links (1995), the first ever national research into the prevalence of domestic violence in Ireland, 18% of Irish Women reported they had been abused in relationships with male partners.
Ireland- Since the beginning of 1996, 134 women have been murdered in Ireland. Of those 84 were killed in their own homes. Of the cases which have been resolved, in just under half (49% of the cases, the murder was committed by a partner or ex-partner.
Ireland- In 1999, two out of three women who sought refuge accommodation were refused (1104 women were refused refuge accommodation in the Eastern Regional Health Authority area and 609 women were accommodated - Kelleher 2001)
Ireland- In 2006, 3,132 barring orders were applied for and 1,357 were granted. In the same year 1,221 Safety Orders were granted, 99 were refused and 1,726 struck out/withdrawn. 2,845 protection orders were granted whilst 99 were refused and 193 struck out/withdrawn. (The Courts Services Annual Report, 2006)
Ireland- 4 out of 10 women who had been involved in a sexual relationship with a man experienced violence (Reported frequency of domestic violence; cross sectional survey of women attending general practice, February 20002)
Ireland - Safety and Sanctions, research conducted by Women's Aid into domestic violence and the enforcement of law in Ireland in 1999, showed that children were present in the house or witnessed the violence in a significant amount of cases.
Ireland - A study conducted by the Rotunda Maternity Hospital found that in a sample of 400 pregnant women, 12.5% had experienced abuse while they were pregnant
I'm not denying the existence of violence against men by women but studies have shown that women are seven times more likely to need medical care afterward. Gilbert did not survive the domestic violence Bourke subjected her to.
Bourke was found guilty of murder. It was not a crime of passion. There was no provocation. It was premeditated.
In her closing statement, prosecuting counsel Isobel Kennedy argued that in order for a defense of provocation, there had to be a total loss of self-control. Mr Bourke had known for 10 weeks before Ms Gilbert's death that his wife was going to leave him, she said. He had told gardai that he had wanted to hurt her as she had hurt him, and had sent a text to a colleague on the night before her death saying that he hated her and would have killed her had he not left the house.
It is disgusting that this defense was even considered. It's classic blame-the-victim. Bourke's defense boils down to "she made me do it" and "she was asking for it". Gilbert did not make Bourke stab her four times in front of their children. Gilbert did not ask to be murdered. Gilbert did not ask for her children to be traumatised.
Bourke tried to cowardly free himself from the responsibility of his actions. But the jury has spoken. I'm sure Gilbert didn't ask for Bourke to spend his life in prison either. He has committed murder. It's his responsibility. Gilbert is the victim. Bourke was not "provoked beyond reason".
Mar 27, 2009
John Waters misses the point - again
In the Irish Times, John Waters pontificates on the recent #picturegate scandal and misses the point with molelike precision.
etc etc ranting on artistic merit and violations of national security.
The actual point is government interference in public broadcasting, censorship, freedom of the press and freedom of expression.
Waters may not like Conor Casby's pictures but Casby has the right to caricature public figures.
Just as the Irish Times does each day.
RTE's craven apologies stink of government interference. They are not even willing to stand by their own reports.
Gardaí raided a radio station.
Gardaí said the orders came from the powers that be.
Gardaí confiscated privately owned material.
That's the point and Waters missed it by a mile. Moron.
...infantile obsession with toilet humour... deep animus towards politicians"... The only amusing thing here is Casby’s deluded belief that he has something to say. His response is typical of a public discourse almost fatally degraded by internet auto-eroticism and an obsession with what is called “comedy”. His works are crude, unfunny, vindictive, without intrinsic content and wholly lacking in artistic merit.
They would never have been heard of had the national broadcaster not misplaced its editorial instincts and, faced with an alternative between soberly reporting a minor crime and engaging in a snide attack on the Taoiseach, chose the latter.
etc etc ranting on artistic merit and violations of national security.The actual point is government interference in public broadcasting, censorship, freedom of the press and freedom of expression.
Waters may not like Conor Casby's pictures but Casby has the right to caricature public figures.
Just as the Irish Times does each day.RTE's craven apologies stink of government interference. They are not even willing to stand by their own reports.
Gardaí raided a radio station.
Gardaí said the orders came from the powers that be.
Gardaí confiscated privately owned material.
That's the point and Waters missed it by a mile. Moron.
Feb 26, 2009
Rape is cheaper than bullets
The words sound like an advert, promoting rape. The article in the Guardian makes the argument that
But what good is throwing a third of women who see that poster under the bus to raise awareness? What is the good in advertising rape? It doesn't help the girls and women suffering in conflict zones. Presumably this is a donate campaign. But the willingness of Amnesty to trample of the feelings of the 1 in 3 women who have been raped, makes me less inclined to donate.
As for the poster itself it is offensive yes but not offensive in a manner that would change attitudes. If I thought that the poster could do something, anything to relieve the suffering of women and girls in the conflict zone I would shout it from the rooftops. I'm all about ending violence towards women. I am all for ending rape (been raped twice myself) but this campaign looks like it is offering a viable alternative to purchasing bullets. Not many people read the fine print.
Amnesty is willing to trigger a third of the female population to advertise what appears to be monetary saving for arms dealers. Doesn't sound like much of a human rights organisation to me.
I was a communications professional before depression and I worked in a developing world country in Asia with high incidence of rape and domestic abuse. This campaign would have contributed less than nothing to those women and girls. I'm all for raising awareness and pouring money into campaigns but this is irresponsible and offensive.
h/t Cara
if it's offensive then that is nothing compared to what hundreds of thousands of women and girls are suffering in conflict zones around the world.
But what good is throwing a third of women who see that poster under the bus to raise awareness? What is the good in advertising rape? It doesn't help the girls and women suffering in conflict zones. Presumably this is a donate campaign. But the willingness of Amnesty to trample of the feelings of the 1 in 3 women who have been raped, makes me less inclined to donate.
As for the poster itself it is offensive yes but not offensive in a manner that would change attitudes. If I thought that the poster could do something, anything to relieve the suffering of women and girls in the conflict zone I would shout it from the rooftops. I'm all about ending violence towards women. I am all for ending rape (been raped twice myself) but this campaign looks like it is offering a viable alternative to purchasing bullets. Not many people read the fine print.
Amnesty is willing to trigger a third of the female population to advertise what appears to be monetary saving for arms dealers. Doesn't sound like much of a human rights organisation to me.
I was a communications professional before depression and I worked in a developing world country in Asia with high incidence of rape and domestic abuse. This campaign would have contributed less than nothing to those women and girls. I'm all for raising awareness and pouring money into campaigns but this is irresponsible and offensive.
h/t Cara
Feb 6, 2009
Kevin Myers - now available in racist and sexist!
Kevin Myers is out again in fine form adding sexism to his standard racism. Why is this guy still getting published? It's amazing that once again this piece was approved by the Sindo editors. Aren't there laws against this kinda thing? This piece is almost a year old but the fate of Pamela Izevbekhai's daughters still hangs in the balance.
Myers begins by comparing male circumcision and female genital mutilation
Is Myers making the point that "the mob of the usual suspects" are wrong in seeking justice for victims of torture? Sounds like a classic "what about the menz" argument. Taking a single example of a horrific crime and comparing it to a systematic abuse of millions of women is abhorrent. Myers is forgetting perhaps, that one in three women is a victim of gender based violence, that rapists in this country are given light sentences and that in the case of rape the female survivor's character is assassinated.
What happened to Callis Osajhae is tragic. That baby is an innocent victim. Osagie Igbinidion should obviously be in prison since he killed a child. Why is Myers not blaming the judge? Why is Myers not campaigning for justice for Callis? Why is Myers making a horrific comparison between a tragic fuckup and the systematic mutilation of female babies? Why has Myers not pointing out that male circumcision is part of western culture too and that the "it's Nigerian culture" excuse doesn't fly? Why doesn't Myers get his head out of his arse?
It is vital to make the distinction. Male circumcision is the removal of the foreskin that is normally not life threatening and circumcised men enjoy a fully functional sex life post operation. Many Irish male babies are circumcised. It does not impede normal bodily functions or cause lifelong pain.
Female genital mutilation is an attempt to cut a girl so severely that she can never enjoy sex. It is designed to enforce chastity. It is traumatic, painful and defined as torture. There are four types of mutilation
All this is done without anesthesia. It is a violation of human rights and is done without consent.
Girls are systematically cut between the ages of 4 and 8 but it can happen at any time from infancy to puberty. Calling it circumcision is disingenuous. It is not circumcision as our "white, western values" define it. For more information watch this but it does contain disturbing images.
Done at the mother's instigation? Pamela Izevbekhai is trying to prevent it from happening to her daughters, Naomi and Jemima. She has already lost one daughter to this practice.
Irrelevant.
Is Myers trying to float the idea that torturing girls is a baseless threat? That we should not be doing everything we can for people who are under threat of mutilation? That is truly disgusting.
As someone who has repeatedly suffered from gender based violence I say fuck you Myers.
Myers compares a judge's decision to a feminist takeover perhaps because it's the only way for him to stand up for the son of one asylum seeker and condemn the daughters of another. Truly classless Myers.
Myers begins by comparing male circumcision and female genital mutilation
I will give you the background to this column in the presumption that you do not know it, and the reason you don't is that the victim at its centre did not possess a vulva.
Instead, he owned a penis, and so neither our media, nor our political classes, took any interest in his fate. Had he been a girl, you know that the mob of the usual suspects -- Amnesty International, the Council for the Status of Women, the Equality Commission, Aunt Thomasina and all -- would have been trumpeting condemnations of the affair.
Is Myers making the point that "the mob of the usual suspects" are wrong in seeking justice for victims of torture? Sounds like a classic "what about the menz" argument. Taking a single example of a horrific crime and comparing it to a systematic abuse of millions of women is abhorrent. Myers is forgetting perhaps, that one in three women is a victim of gender based violence, that rapists in this country are given light sentences and that in the case of rape the female survivor's character is assassinated.
Two-and-half-years ago, a Nigerian idiot named Osagie Igbinidion was found not guilty of the reckless endangerment of life, after a little boy he circumcised, 29-day-old Callis Osajhae, bled to death. The trial judge, Kevin Haugh, told the jury not to bring their "white, western values" to bear upon their deliberations. Describing the case as a clash between two cultures, he added: "This is a relatively recent matter that Ireland will have to deal with now that we have a significant migrant population. You are not asked whether this form of procedure is acceptable in Ireland. If you start thinking on those lines, you are doing Mr Igbinidion a great injustice."
Just one commentator in the media remarked upon this extraordinary case, in which a man walked free from a court having sexually mutilated and mortally wounded a little boy. Me. I wrote: " . . . had the dead child been female, I believe that no jury would have been told not to bring their white, western values to bear on the case -- or if they had been, we may equally be sure that the judge would not be dangling from the nearest lamp-post . . ."
I do not know what that fine fellow Osagie Igbinidion is doing today.
He has not, to my knowledge, and considerable regret, been deported -- nor has he been issued with a court order compelling him to desist from his merry trade (he is a fourth generation circumciser; ah the joys of multiculturalism). So it is as legal to chop little boys' penises off today as it was then, and if they die as a consequence, the judicial advice rings down the years, not to bring our "white western values" into the case.
But when the infant in question is a girl, then those white, western values are suddenly all we care about; hence the uproar over Pamela Izevbekhai and her two daughters. She is challenging a deportation order to Nigeria, for fear that the girls might be circumcised upon their return, and alleges that another daughter, Elizabeth, aged 18 months, died in 1994 from blood loss after being circumcised.
What happened to Callis Osajhae is tragic. That baby is an innocent victim. Osagie Igbinidion should obviously be in prison since he killed a child. Why is Myers not blaming the judge? Why is Myers not campaigning for justice for Callis? Why is Myers making a horrific comparison between a tragic fuckup and the systematic mutilation of female babies? Why has Myers not pointing out that male circumcision is part of western culture too and that the "it's Nigerian culture" excuse doesn't fly? Why doesn't Myers get his head out of his arse?
It is vital to make the distinction. Male circumcision is the removal of the foreskin that is normally not life threatening and circumcised men enjoy a fully functional sex life post operation. Many Irish male babies are circumcised. It does not impede normal bodily functions or cause lifelong pain.
Female genital mutilation is an attempt to cut a girl so severely that she can never enjoy sex. It is designed to enforce chastity. It is traumatic, painful and defined as torture. There are four types of mutilation
- Type I is the excision of the clitoral hood with or without removal of all or part of the clitoris.
- Type II is the excision of the clitoris together with part or all of the labia minora
- Type III is the excision of part or all of the external genitalia and stitching or narrowing of the vaginal opening, leaving a very small opening, about the size of a matchstick, to allow for the flow of urine and menstrual blood. The girl or woman’s legs are generally bound together from the hip to the ankle so she remains immobile for approximately 40 days to allow for the formation of scar tissue.
- Type IV includes the introduction of corrosive substances into the vagina.
All this is done without anesthesia. It is a violation of human rights and is done without consent.
Well, allegedly; a court hearing earlier this year was told that the attending doctor had diagnosed the death "as being possibly the result of the traditional female circumcision" which had been performed on the girl. Possibly, eh? And that girl was 18 months old, 14 years ago. But her two surviving daughters had not been circumcised by the time they left Nigeria in 2005, when they were aged approximately two and four years of age, respectively.
Girls are systematically cut between the ages of 4 and 8 but it can happen at any time from infancy to puberty. Calling it circumcision is disingenuous. It is not circumcision as our "white, western values" define it. For more information watch this but it does contain disturbing images.
Female circumcision is very common in Nigeria, but it is not mandatory, and is usually done at the mother's instigation -- which is unlikely to be the case here. Either way, our "white, western values" are properly affronted and appalled by the very notion of removing a girl's vulva; so these may be invoked to protect a girl from genital mutilation. They cannot, however, be invoked to protect a boy either from genital mutilation, or from the death which results when the bugling Nigerian cretin with the knife accidentally kills him.
Done at the mother's instigation? Pamela Izevbekhai is trying to prevent it from happening to her daughters, Naomi and Jemima. She has already lost one daughter to this practice.
There are many ancillary questions to this little affair. How did Pamela Izevbekhai manage to get from Nigeria to Ireland? En route, how many countries did she pass through where they don't have female circumcision? Why did she choose here as a refuge from the barbaric circumcisers of Nigeria, and not somewhere closer to home?
Irrelevant.
As for my own opinions on the matter, well, on the one hand the family has settled in Sligo, so a large part of me thinks they should be allowed to stay. But what if we are being duped? What if a baseless threat of circumcision is being falsely used to enable the Izevbekhais to stay?
And even if it's not, are we to be the refuge for every single Nigerian or Somalia or Chadean or Kuwaiti woman who wants to avoid genital mutilation? So all they have to do is get here, allege that if they go home they'll be circumcised, and then we must give them asylum: is that it? And if we don't, are we then to get the self-appointed cranks from Residents Against Racism accusing us of being racist, and then RAR will be rewarded with their usual quota of headlines?
Is Myers trying to float the idea that torturing girls is a baseless threat? That we should not be doing everything we can for people who are under threat of mutilation? That is truly disgusting.
As someone who has repeatedly suffered from gender based violence I say fuck you Myers.
Meanwhile, the asylum-seekers' little sons can still lawfully be genitally mutilated, right here in Ireland-of-the-Sisters, and maybe even die, because apparently that's part of Nigerian culture. And naturally, not one of our feminist-dominated quangos will utter a word of condemnation.
Marvellous, bloody marvellous.
Myers compares a judge's decision to a feminist takeover perhaps because it's the only way for him to stand up for the son of one asylum seeker and condemn the daughters of another. Truly classless Myers.
Jan 21, 2009
Killing freedom of speech in Russia
From Natalia
Killing human rights defenders and journalists is the first offensive of a corrupt government. It is an effective silencing technique that destroys freedom of expression and passively permits criminality. It is why there is a Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders and organisations such as Reporters Without Borders.
Yesterday, in broad daylight, in the center of Moscow, a human rights lawyer and a journalist were gunned down. Lawyer Stanislav Markelov was most famous for representing the family of Elza Kungaeva, a young Chechen woman killed by a Russian officer, in a case that polarized the Russian Federation. Anastasia Baburova was a young journalist for Novaya Gazeta - a publication that is still mourning the death of another journalist, Anna Politkovskaya.
This week, some across Russia are celebrating this tragedy. Comments on Baburova’s Live Journal site have been shut off, but before they were, news of neo-Nazis gloating over her death had spread far and wide. Others are merely wagging their finger at “poor Nastya” for having “kept bad company” - meaning, of course, that she should have known better than to hang out with the hated Markelov.
It looks as though “the enemy of the people” may be a phrase that we will have to start using in earnest again.
Killing human rights defenders and journalists is the first offensive of a corrupt government. It is an effective silencing technique that destroys freedom of expression and passively permits criminality. It is why there is a Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders and organisations such as Reporters Without Borders.
Jan 13, 2009
Yet another health care crisis
Now I may be accused of "flogging a dead Equinusian packbeast" but our health service is lacking. The Irish Times highlights yet another flaw in the system, that is possibly fatal.
Well it's too late to ask Lenihan for a new Health Services Executive. Let's cross our fingers and hope that our entire health system doesn't collapse before next year's budget. Cos hope is all that we have left. There is the possibility that people may end up robbing valium just to deal with the stress of that pesky clot in the brain and an 18 month waiting list.
So while you are stressing about the ticking clock the HSE is commissioning reports and paying administrators.
Well it sucks to be them. Better hope that you don't get sick no matter how much health insurance you pay.
Why is this not setting alarm bells off? Why can other countries manage their health systems and still provide free health care? Why can hospitals in some developing countries provide high standard health care for a reasonable price tag but one of the most expensive countries in Europe cannot.
If the budget is there, why have vacant posts? Is it jobs for the boys or incompetence?
I am bitter about health care in Ireland since 2004 when I paid 150 euro to see a consultant about a potentially life-threatening condition. He spent five minutes with me, did no physical examination and when I asked about the condition, told me to go look it up on the internet. I was then bundled out the door. I sent letters of complaint but they went unanswered.
To me, the most fantastic aspect of the health care crisis in Ireland is that there was no journalistic outrage when Mary Harney stood up beside Brian Cowen and Micheál Martin and blamed former ministers of health for the systemic problems. The two previous ministers for health were standing beside her. How does that go unremarked?
It's enough to make one want to run for office if only to expose FF incompetance.
Believe it or not health is a human right. It states clearly in the "Right to Health Factsheet No 31" that.
Yeah the government is required to provide timely access to basic health services. So step up Minister.
BOTH PRIVATE and public patients must wait up to 18 months before being seen by a consultant neurologist, a review of neurology services has found.
It also found that patients being assessed on an outpatient basis have to wait 10 months for an MRI scan and 90 days for an EEG test of the brain.
Well it's too late to ask Lenihan for a new Health Services Executive. Let's cross our fingers and hope that our entire health system doesn't collapse before next year's budget. Cos hope is all that we have left. There is the possibility that people may end up robbing valium just to deal with the stress of that pesky clot in the brain and an 18 month waiting list.
So while you are stressing about the ticking clock the HSE is commissioning reports and paying administrators.
The report, commissioned by the Health Service Executive and drawn up by senior HSE managers, consultants, nurses, allied health professionals, GPs and patient advocates, found that inpatients may have to wait up to two weeks to see a therapist or a psychologist, “thereby prolonging their length of hospital stay”.
“Outpatient services were considerably less accessible with many patients waiting between three to six months for a minimal service and in some cases, no service at all,” it states.
The report, which took two years to research and complete under the chairmanship of the then assistant national director of strategic health planning with the HSE, Dr Marie Laffoy, deals with conditions such as dementia, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis and acquired brain injury.
Despite some recent investment, it paints a bleak picture for patients seeking diagnosis and treatment of potentially life threatening conditions.
Well it sucks to be them. Better hope that you don't get sick no matter how much health insurance you pay.
A consultant neurologist quoted in the report says: “I am aware that some patients travel to other countries to see a neurologist because of the delays here – I know of one patient who was seen in Stuttgart and another who went to Scotland.”
Why is this not setting alarm bells off? Why can other countries manage their health systems and still provide free health care? Why can hospitals in some developing countries provide high standard health care for a reasonable price tag but one of the most expensive countries in Europe cannot.
The HSE says funding of €3 million was provided in 2006 for the development of neurology and neurophysiology services, and that there are 24 approved posts of consultant neurologist, an increase of 10 since 2003.
If the budget is there, why have vacant posts? Is it jobs for the boys or incompetence?
I am bitter about health care in Ireland since 2004 when I paid 150 euro to see a consultant about a potentially life-threatening condition. He spent five minutes with me, did no physical examination and when I asked about the condition, told me to go look it up on the internet. I was then bundled out the door. I sent letters of complaint but they went unanswered.
To me, the most fantastic aspect of the health care crisis in Ireland is that there was no journalistic outrage when Mary Harney stood up beside Brian Cowen and Micheál Martin and blamed former ministers of health for the systemic problems. The two previous ministers for health were standing beside her. How does that go unremarked?
It's enough to make one want to run for office if only to expose FF incompetance.
Believe it or not health is a human right. It states clearly in the "Right to Health Factsheet No 31" that.
The right to health contains entitlements. These entitlements include:
- The right to a system of health protection providing equality of opportunity for everyone to enjoy the highest attainable level of health;
- The right to prevention, treatment and control of diseases;
- Access to essential medicines;
- Maternal, child and reproductive health;
- Equal and timely access to basic health services;
- The provision of health-related education and information;
- Participation of the population in health-related decision-making at the national and community levels.
Yeah the government is required to provide timely access to basic health services. So step up Minister.
Dec 29, 2008
Israel's war crimes
From the Beeb
Israel's behaviour is nothing short of crimes against humanity. Blatant violation of human rights. The UN Security Council has called an emergency session.
The international community needs to condemn Israel for war crimes. Now. There are no words.
Israeli air force jets have bombed the Islamic University in the Gaza Strip, a significant cultural symbol for Hamas.
Warplanes also struck Hamas government offices as air raids aimed at forcing Palestinian militants to halt rocket fire into southern Israel continued.
Palestinian medics say nearly 300 people have been killed in the air raids that began on Saturday.
Israel has threatened to launch a ground assault and is now calling up 6,500 army reservists.
Witnesses in Gaza said they saw six separate air strikes on the Islamic University, hitting a laboratory building, just after midnight.
The university is a centre of support for Hamas - the Islamist militant group which controls the Gaza Strip. Many of its top officials graduated from there.
A BBC journalist in Gaza said the university authorities had evacuated the campus a few days ago as they had been expecting a strike.
Israel's behaviour is nothing short of crimes against humanity. Blatant violation of human rights. The UN Security Council has called an emergency session.
28 December 2008 – The Security Council on Sunday called on Israel and the Palestinians to immediately end all violence, as Israeli airstrikes in response to rocket attacks by militants in Gaza reportedly killed 270 people and wounded more than 600 in the Strip.
“The Members of the Security Council expressed serious concern at the escalation of the situation in Gaza and called for an immediate halt to all violence,” according to a statement issued to the press following emergency closed-door talks late last night.
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon made a similar call yesterday in a statement in which he voiced his deep alarm at the “heavy violence and bloodshed in Gaza, and the continuation of violence in southern Israel.”
In another statement issued today, Mr. Ban “deplores that violence is continuing today, and he strongly urges once again an immediate stop to all acts of violence.”
The international community needs to condemn Israel for war crimes. Now. There are no words.
Dec 12, 2008
We won
Unbelievably the huge event that I've been preparing for what seems like forever is over. My feet ache and I still can't sleep but it's done. I haven't read a RSS feed in about a week and haven't had a good night's sleep in six months. All I want to do now to get a beer IV, all the quiches I can eat, and endless cigarettes.

To vastly inflate my achievement, I draw comparisons between B5 and my situation. It's as if I had just defeated the Shadows and the Vorlons.
I fought an epic battle against the forces of ev0l - administrators, persnickity performance artists, misunderstandings, bureaucratic nightmares, developing world services.
On the side of the forces of good were myself, Misses B and A, and Messers H and N. We won but it was a tough battle. Imagine if B5 was run by Ivanova instead of Sheridan.
I am Ivanova in this scenario.
So the battle is won and my collapse is imminent. Just have to hold it together to send stuff home, pack, sell my belonging and get on the fucking plane.
Hell yeah!

To vastly inflate my achievement, I draw comparisons between B5 and my situation. It's as if I had just defeated the Shadows and the Vorlons.
I fought an epic battle against the forces of ev0l - administrators, persnickity performance artists, misunderstandings, bureaucratic nightmares, developing world services.
On the side of the forces of good were myself, Misses B and A, and Messers H and N. We won but it was a tough battle. Imagine if B5 was run by Ivanova instead of Sheridan.I am Ivanova in this scenario.
So the battle is won and my collapse is imminent. Just have to hold it together to send stuff home, pack, sell my belonging and get on the fucking plane.
Hell yeah!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
What's all this about?
ireland
(84)
Irish government
(59)
economic shitstorm
(55)
catholic church
(47)
fucked up
(43)
child abuse
(39)
sexism
(30)
human rights
(29)
lenihan
(29)
politics
(29)
cowen
(28)
ryan report
(25)
poor planning and wilful ignorance
(24)
violence
(20)
GC
(18)
corruption
(18)
douchebag
(18)
feminism
(18)
women
(18)
banks
(16)
Anglo Irish
(15)
ethics
(15)
gender
(15)
cork
(14)
double standards
(14)
humour
(14)
rape culture
(14)
gender based violence
(13)
day
(12)
misogyny
(12)
scumbags
(12)
lol
(11)
children
(10)
fianna fail
(10)
green party
(9)
journalism
(9)
murphy report
(9)
abortion
(8)
bludget
(8)
dermot ahern
(8)
government
(8)
health
(8)
idiots
(8)
insomnia
(8)
lisbon treaty
(8)
news
(8)
property developers
(8)
epic fail
(7)
floods
(7)
hump day humour
(7)
incompetence
(7)
coughlan
(6)
depression
(6)
euros
(6)
fear mongering
(6)
media
(6)
medical professionals
(6)
ads
(5)
bloggers
(5)
elections
(5)
ill
(5)
judgments
(5)
justice
(5)
nama
(5)
odonoghue
(5)
racism
(5)
recession
(5)
work
(5)
civil liberties
(4)
corrib gas field
(4)
holidays
(4)
mental health
(4)
okeeffe
(4)
rape apology
(4)
religion
(4)
Blasphemous Libel
(3)
GAA
(3)
homophobia
(3)
nothing to see move along there
(3)
pat kenny
(3)
religious bigotry
(3)
censorship
(2)
classism
(2)
kenny
(2)
odea
(2)
petrol prices
(1)


